WHO Guidance on „Sexuality for Infants“ Sparks Outrage

Introduction

The World Health Organization (WHO) has come under fire for its guidance on “sexuality for infants,” which has been criticized as promoting sexualization of children. The guidance, which was published in a report titled “Standards for Sexuality Education in Europe,” recommends that children as young as four be taught about masturbation, gender identity, and same-sex relationships. The report has sparked outrage among parents, religious groups, and conservative politicians, who argue that it is inappropriate and harmful to expose young children to sexual content.

Arguments Against the Guidance

Critics of the WHO guidance argue that it is part of a broader agenda to promote gender ideology and sexual liberation, which they say is harmful to children. They argue that children should be allowed to develop naturally, without being subjected to adult concepts of sexuality. They also argue that exposing children to sexual content at a young age can lead to confusion, anxiety, and trauma.

Some critics have also accused the WHO of promoting pedophilia, arguing that the guidance is part of a broader effort to normalize sexual relationships between adults and children. They point to the fact that the guidance recommends teaching children about “pleasure” and “enjoyment” in relation to sexual activity, which they say is inappropriate for young children.

Arguments in Favor of the Guidance

Supporters of the WHO guidance argue that it is necessary to provide children with accurate information about sexuality in order to promote healthy relationships and prevent sexual abuse. They argue that children are naturally curious about their bodies and sexuality, and that it is important to provide them with age-appropriate information in order to prevent them from seeking out harmful or inaccurate information online.

They also argue that teaching children about gender identity and same-sex relationships is important for promoting acceptance and tolerance of diversity. They argue that children who are exposed to these concepts at a young age are more likely to be accepting of people who are different from themselves, and less likely to engage in bullying or discrimination.

Finally, supporters of the guidance argue that it is not promoting sexual activity among young children, but rather providing them with information about their bodies and emotions. They argue that teaching children about masturbation, for example, is not encouraging them to engage in sexual activity, but rather helping them to understand their own bodies and emotions.

Conclusion

The debate over the WHO guidance on “sexuality for infants” is likely to continue, with both sides firmly entrenched in their positions. While some argue that the guidance is promoting harmful and inappropriate content to young children, others argue that it is necessary to provide children with accurate information about their bodies and sexuality in order to promote healthy relationships and prevent sexual abuse. Ultimately, the decision about what children should be taught about sexuality is a complex one, and will likely depend on a variety of factors, including cultural norms, religious beliefs, and individual values

Original article Teaser

Outrage Over WHO Guidance on “Sexuality for Infants”

The World Health Organisation (WHO) is under pressure to withdraw guidance for schools recommending that toddlers “ask questions about sexuality”, “explore gender identities” and learn about “enjoyment” of “early childhood masturbation”. The Telegraph has the story. The guidance says that “sexuality education starts from birth” and is described as a “framework for policy makers, educational and health authorities and specialists”. Its advice on how to “talk about sexual matters” with young children was aimed at policymakers across Europe, and was translated into several European languages and promoted at national and international events, according to the WHO. The document was also consulted by Welsh ministers who last year rolled out a mandatory sexual education syllabus to schools in Wales, and has led to a backlash from

Details to Outrage Over WHO Guidance on “Sexuality for Infants”