The rise of the new ‘Woke’ Religion is not just a miserable coincidence

The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Exposé.

By a concerned reader

The ‘New’ Woke Religion is The Precise Opposite of Biblical Christianity – That is Not a Coincidence

The most help I can give anyone to understand what is going on with gene hacking vaccines, with the great reset into a social credit score controlled universal digital currency and with the blind wokeification of mainstream media, of governments and of large corporations against the will of the majority of the people whom they are supposed to be informing, representing and serving is to expose who is behind these changes and what the real purpose of their global agenda is.

The trouble I have is that in order to do that I have to bust through thousands of years of psy ops which have been the preparation for the coming global war. But the wonderful thing about language is that there will be a phrase which has that power. All I have to do is find that phrase and thousands of years of deception are undone.

Here are my first shots at it..

1. There is always a king, democracy is merely his camouflage. 

2. “Hi. I’m Cain, the new Satan. Me and my pals will be stealing absolutely everything you own, taking control of every single financial transaction you hope to make, robbing you of every freedom you have ever had and then stealing your very genes themselves under the guise of a vaccination (cool trick huh?). We will be turning you into our slaves. Regrettably we are heartless control freaks. So any resistance to our plan will be suicidal for you. We will either kill your ourselves directly or send you to the front lines in WW3 or get you with our latest plague or starve you of well –  of absolutely everything really – by excluding you from the financial system with this new wizbang 2 factor identification wheeze we are forcing every financial institution to adopt under the premise of extra security.  I am afraid you will fail to be identified. Your own computerised money will say: No. But there again it was never really your money now was it? No it was all mine. In fact everything is mine. And you are mine. Well, either that or you are dead. One other piece of advice. I like to be worshipped (a lot). So join my little ole church of woke would ya – there’s a good fellow.”  

“We tried the above on a focus group and it didn’t play too well. So instead our agents pretend that we are precisely the opposite of what we really are. Whereas we pretend that we do not exist at all. So…

Don’t stop believing – that I am a fairytale.” 

3. Whoever the King of the world is. He plainly does not want to be identified. What is the purpose of Identity politics? To manufacture a fake identity which masks and actually replaces your true identity. The greatest manifestation of that device is demon possession.

But just in case none of the above hit the spot, I have prepared a table below which compares biblical Christianity to this ‘new’ religion of Wokeness. It shows clearly that the two are polar opposites. I did not prepare the table to bore you with an academic comparison between two religious ideologies (well not entirely for that reason). No. I prepared it to prove to you that those behind the church of woke are the spiritual enemies of Jesus and Christianity, the modern day Pharisees, the serpents, the offspring of vipers of Matthew23. Yes, the demons. Their religion is anti Christian and their leader is therefore the anti Christ.  I could find no tenet of biblical Christianity that is not reversed in wokeism. If you can find one please put it in the comments below!

OFFENCE  

The bible teaches to turn other cheek when offended. The woke cult teaches to shun to cancel to exclude and to destroy the career of those who take a position deemed offensive to the cult..

38 You have heard that it was said: “An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth;”

39 but I say to you, Do not stand against the evil [man] but whoever strikes you on the right cheek, turn the other to him also. (Matthew 5)

What does this mean that we should not stand against the evil one? If he rapes our firstborn daughter should we hand him also our secondborn?

Jesus answers that question by giving us the relevant law for comparison which in full says…

19 And when a man causes a blemish in his neighbour, as he has done, so it shall be done to him;

20 break for break, eye for eye, tooth for tooth. As he has given a blemish [to be] in a man, so it shall be done to him. (Leviticus 24 GLT)

23 But if injury occurs, you shall give life for life,

24 eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,

25 branding for branding, wound for wound, stripe for stripe. (Exodus 21 GLT)

So lasting damage is to be repaid. But embarrassment, offence, insults or temporary damage are not policed. Further the law of Moses deputises all citizens into law enforcement should they wish by saying…

2 If the thief is found breaking in, and is stricken and dies, no blood [shall be] shed for him.

3 If the sun has risen on him, blood [is] due for him; repaying he shall repay. If he has nothing, then he should be sold for his theft. (Exodus 22 GLT)

So if someone unrelated to the crime, sees a break in and intervenes during that break in to physically prevent it, and is resisted by the thief to the point where the thief is killed. Then there is no bloodguilt. This is because the thief is breaking the law. So his law breaking can be resisted with impunity.

Does this mean that if you see a child stealing a bar of chocolate from a shop you can kill him with impunity? No. Because the law has a comparison between killing the thief as a way of stopping the theft and killing the thief in a way that is definitely not for that purpose. So for example if you stopped a thief and tied his hands at the scene, and then killed him 5 minutes later but during the day of his theft, you would be blood guilty. Because the principle is that you only escape bloodguilt if you are policing the theft itself. Likewise it is not necessary to kill a child (unless he is armed) in order to stop a theft. So if you killed child stealing a chocolate bar in circumstances where you had the opportunity to stop the theft without killing him (by grabbing his hand and removing the chocolate bar for example). You would be blood guilty. One is only guilt free from the killing if one’s actions were policing the theft period. A deliberately heavy handed policing of a theft, where for example a man punched a female thief in the face and knocked her out and she died, in circumstances where she was not offering resistance which required that level of response from the man to successfully prevent the theft, would also be treated as homicide.

This of course is the principle that has historically failed to be applied by American police officers. But has historically more successfully been applied by British police. American police appear to believe that they have the right to kill suspects who do not immediately obey their commands. Now if that command is to drop the weapon, then they have a case, But if that command is stop thief then they have a case only if there is no other means to prevent the theft other than shooting the suspect. If they have a taser for example but they choose to use a gun, then they are blood guilty and that is homicide. If the thief drops the stolen goods and runs off, and is shot after dropping the goods, that would also be homicide and the police would be blood guilty. If the thief ignores the command to stop thief and runs off with the goods and if the police immediately shoot him, that would be homicide and the police would be blood guilty because it has not yet been determined whether the police could have run after the thief and apprehended him. 

The idea that a police officer can shoot a thief because he cannot be bothered to give him chase is abhorrent. Killing a thief in the act is only justified when that is the ONLY AVAILABLE method of preventing the theft.  

If for example the thief is known to the police and is on social security and is a drug addict stealing to fund his habit (as most of them are). Then shooting him is not the only method to prevent the theft. The better method would be to treat his addiction. And failing that one could dock the value of his theft from his social security payments.

So the bible position is that one can resist lawlessness, but not bad behaviour which does not break the law – such as insults, offence, slaps, embarrassment, put downs etc. Hence the expression: Sticks and stones can break my bones but words can hurt me nothing.

So yes one would resist a wicked one who was attempting to rape one’s daughter. But one would be Chris Rock if being slapped in front of millions of people.

If the wicked one was trying to slap one’s daughter or an elderly frail person one could resist him if there was a significant danger of some type of lasting damage.. 

So one is advised not defend not one’s own ego or one’s wife’s ego as was the case with Will Smith. But instead to defend God’s law, if desired. For the security of society generally depends on the latter not the former. 

But even that does not go far enough. The security of a society is directly proportional to the efficiency of its policing of lawlessness and inversely proportional to how easily offended its members are. The more offence people take in matters which do not break the law (i.e. cause lasting physical damage) the less stable society is. That is assuming that the law is God’s law which protects against lasting physical damage but not against emotional damage. 

Admittedly emotional damage can be just as devastating as physical damage. Indeed it is the cause of many suicide attempts over relationship rejection etc. But God’s law advises people to build up the emotional strength necessary to handle offence without heartbreak whilst actively preventing lasting physical damage such as a broken bone.

It’s all a question of what we ourselves should police and what the state should police. The bible advises that human hearts should police human hearts and that the state should only police lasting physical damage. The Woke religion advises the opposite as regards human hearts. The police in the UK do on occasion arrest people who cause lasting physical damage. But in the US they do not if the perpetrator is woke (such as a member of BLM). Because the purpose of the police force to the 46th president (Barack Obama) is to play politics with the law. Just as it is all to often over here in the UK, where we no longer police theft in any meaningful way.

Jesus advises people not to be snowflakes. The woke religion legislates to protect snowflakes.

FAMILY 

The bible legislates heavily to protect the cohesion and sanctity of the family and the right of children to have two genetic parents one of each biological gender, who have full responsibility for every aspect of the child’s life. The Woke cult takes the opposite position. It actively seeks to destroy the family and hand over all children to the state. Just as the children of slaves were owned by the slave masters. So the children of citizens in a Woke state are owned by the state (as regards education, healthcare, child services, sexual initiation  etc.). Indeed slave owners had sexual rights over the children of their slaves. Whereas today the Woke state practices sexual initiation, child grooming, sexual indoctrination and genital mutilation on children in its authority – often without reference to the parents. 

Maureen Martin whilst standing for Lewisham Mayor pledged to: Cut through political correctness and state the truth that natural marriage between a man and a woman is the fundamental building block for a successful society, and the safest environment for raising children

She was sacked from the London and Quadrant Housing Trust as a result of her true statement. But homosexuals have historically (in 2015) been 15x more likely to be paedophiles than heterosexuals. Hence children are safer from sexual predators in heterosexual marriages than they are in male male homosexual marriages. This is because paedophilia is disproportionately male and disproportionately homosexual compared to the prevalence of men and homosexuality in society in general. So the London and Quadrant Housing Trust is actually siding with homosexual paedophiles and against children.  

Fiona Fletcher-Smith, Chief Executive of L&Q, said: ‘While we respect that individuals’ freedom to hold particular religious or other beliefs is absolute, we do not tolerate it when these beliefs are manifested in a way that is derogatory or offensive to others.

There is some classic double speak for you. If their respect was absolute, then they would ABSOLUTELY tolerate speech that was subjectively judged by sexual activists to be derogatory or offensive.

Maureen is quoted as saying: The message this is sending is if you want to engage politically and make a difference in your community, but if your views don’t line up with the liberal agenda, you can potentially be fired from your job.’ She further explained that: I was not going to back down from my Christian values. I will defend them. Whereas the Daily Mail reported that London and Quadrant was fiercely proud of its endorsement by Stonewall. 

It is a classic example of Biblical Christianity being the direct opposite to Wokeness.

SLAVERY 

Abraham owned 318 slaves in Genesis 14:14. The early Christians described themselves as slaves of God. God is not against slavery. He advocated it in the law of Moses at Exouds22 for thieves who were unable to repay what they stole. Slavery was used as a from privatised prison with a maximum sentence of 7 years and as the original form of privatised social services. If you ran out of food you would offer your labour and if that was not enough you could sell yourself to your brother. There was no unemployment benefit back then. God provided that all Hebrew slaves should be released in the 7th year of servitude. 

12 [And] if thy brother, an Hebrew man, or an Hebrew woman, be sold unto thee, and serve thee 6 years; then in the 7th year thou shalt let him go free from thee. (Deuteronomy 15 KJV)

Jesus did not advise slaves to rebel against their masters. Slavery was also a privatised from of imprisonment…

2 If the thief is found breaking in, and is stricken and dies, no blood [shall be] shed for him.

3 If the sun has risen on him, blood [is] due for him; repaying he shall repay. If he has nothing, then he should be sold for his theft. (Exodus 22 GLT)

So thieves who stole and were caught and were unable to repay were sold as slaves for 6 years. TO the person from whom they stole.

12 [And] if thy brother, an Hebrew man, or an Hebrew woman, be sold unto thee, and serve thee 6 years; then in the 7th year thou shalt let him go free from thee. (KJV)

13 And when thou sendest him out free from thee, thou shalt not let him go away empty: (Deuteronomy 15 KJV)

The Law of Moses permitted slave owners to beat their slaves almost to the point of death but not actually to that point. Today that seems to us to be an inhuman law which should never have been enacted. How can such a law have come from a loving God? The answer appears in Leviticus25…

39 ‘And in case your brother grows poor alongside you and he has to sell himself to you, you must not use him as a worker in slavish service.

40 He should prove to be with you like a hired labourer, like a settler. He should serve with you till the Jubilee year [or after 6 years of Deuteronomy15, whichever is the sooner].

41 And he must go out from you, he and his sons with him, and he must return to his family, and he should return to the possession of his forefathers.

42 For they are my slaves whom I brought out of the land of Egypt. They must not sell themselves the way a slave is sold.

43 You must not tread down upon him with tyranny, and you must be in fear of your God.

44 As for your slave man and your slave girl who become yours from the nations that are round about you people, from them you may buy a slave man and a slave girl.

45 And also from the sons of the settlers who are residing as aliens with you, from them you may buy, and from their families that are with you whom they had born to them in your land; and they must become your possession.

46 And you must pass them on as an inheritance to your sons after you to inherit as a possession to time indefinite. You may use them as workers, but upon your brothers the sons of Israel, you must not tread, the one upon the other, with tyranny.

(Leviticus 25 NWT)

The foreign slave you could use as a worker. But he too had some protection from Exodus 22…

21 And you must not maltreat an alien resident or oppress him, for you people became alien residents in the land of Egypt. (Exodus 22).

So both the national and the foreign slaves should be used as hired workers (i.e. precisely as a permanent employee today), not as workers in slavish service and neither group should be maltreated or oppressed. although what redress either type of slave would have in the event of tyrannical or slavish treatment which fell short of causing physical damage (for which they were to be released) I do not know.

So God gave individuals huge authority over their slaves. He did this in order that they should learn how to exercise that authority with compassion rather than the state denying them that lesson. He trusted them to learn it. He did not trust the state to enforce it. It is the power balance between the state and the individual that God views so differently from modern man. The state back then could kill and maime tens of thousands of their subjects with impunity in unjustified wars. Slave owners could kill nobody and if they maimed their slave he had to be set free. Today we condemn slave owners whether they abused their slaves or not. But we continue to fight unjustified wars which are incalculably more horrific without properly condemning those who instigate them. Indeed we shower state honours on Sir Tony Blair. Meanwhile the state is in the process of enslaving us all through the great reset and social credit score linked digital currencies.

CONCLUSION

Wokeness is the precise antithesis to Christianity. It is the tacit rejection of every principle that Jesus Christ died to defend and to establish. It is therefore the fastest path to moral destruction that it is possible to follow. For the purpose of Biblical morality (when properly understood) is to prevent a society of free willed beings from destroying itself without unduly limiting their free will. Therefore Woke worship is the very religion of the demons. Therefore they are right now down here recruiting worshippers for their church of damnation. If you are woke, you are in that church. Of course they do not announce that they are here because they can only succeed by deception. They do not even admit that they are running a church. So repulsive is their true agenda and so inhuman are the ways in which they seek to achieve it.

If you are woke you are an enemy of mankind’s love, of mankind’s joy, of mankind’s empowerment, of mankind’s advancement, or mankind’s survival, of mankind’s future, of mankind’s past, of mankind’s present and of mankind’s salvation because your hidden masters are such, and have been such enemies for 6014 years since Adam’s sin Eden. You of course will probably not realise that. Because just as Eve was, you are presently being thoroughly deceived by demons who are possessing humans and who are running a church whilst pretending that they are not demons and not running a church. Hence this article.

Any group which censors deplatforms persecutes excludes shuns imprisons fires or kills critics, knows that its position is untenable, and will not stand up to proper scrutiny and values power more than it values truth or love.

Many religions including Christianity have been guilty of every item in the list above. Hence I refer to Biblical Christianity which regrettably is not too close to the religion as practiced in many Christian churches today.

I am not arguing here for any particular Christian church – so abusive have been their attempts to represent the Christ (although I do happen to run one). But I do argue for the Biblical Principles of Christianity, which is essentially spiritualized post genetic Judaism in my opinion, and is referred to politically with terms such as Judeo Christian values.

The argument is that Wokeism, by its unmistakeably anti Christian doctrine, reveals its true sponsor to be the Anti Christ, the king of the descended demons. And furthermore that its recent global rise to prominence proves that they are right now down here seeking your worship.

The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Exposé.