ATF Director Declines to Respond on Whether New Pistol Brace Rule Will Result in Imprisonment of Americans

Introduction

The Acting Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF), Marvin Richardson, recently refused to answer a question about whether Americans would be jailed for violating the agency’s new rule on pistol braces. The rule, which was issued in December 2020, requires owners of firearms with pistol braces to register them with the ATF or face criminal penalties. The rule has been criticized by gun rights advocates, who argue that it could lead to the criminalization of law-abiding gun owners.

The Pistol Brace Rule

The pistol brace rule was issued by the ATF in response to concerns that some pistol braces were being used to circumvent federal laws that regulate short-barreled rifles. Under federal law, a rifle with a barrel length of less than 16 inches is considered a short-barreled rifle and is subject to additional regulations, including registration with the ATF. However, some gun owners have been using pistol braces, which are designed to be attached to the back of a pistol, to create a firearm that is functionally similar to a short-barreled rifle but does not fall under the same regulations.

The new rule requires owners of firearms with pistol braces to register them with the ATF by April 2022. Failure to do so could result in criminal penalties, including fines and imprisonment. The rule has been criticized by gun rights advocates, who argue that it could lead to the criminalization of law-abiding gun owners. They also argue that the rule is vague and could be interpreted in a way that would make many common firearms illegal.

The Controversy

The controversy surrounding the pistol brace rule has been fueled by the ATF’s lack of clarity on how it will be enforced. In a recent hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Acting Director Richardson refused to answer a question about whether Americans would be jailed for violating the rule. When asked by Senator Tom Cotton if he could assure Americans that they would not be jailed for owning a firearm with a pistol brace, Richardson replied, „I cannot give you that assurance.“

The response has been criticized by gun rights advocates, who argue that it shows the ATF’s disregard for the rights of law-abiding gun owners. They also argue that the ATF’s lack of clarity on the rule’s enforcement is a deliberate attempt to intimidate gun owners and discourage them from exercising their Second Amendment rights.

In conclusion, the pistol brace rule issued by the ATF has been a controversial issue among gun rights advocates. The rule requires owners of firearms with pistol braces to register them with the ATF or face criminal penalties. The lack of clarity on how the rule will be enforced has led to concerns that law-abiding gun owners could be criminalized. The recent refusal by the Acting Director of the ATF to answer a question about whether Americans would be jailed for violating the rule has only added to these concerns. It remains to be seen how the issue will be resolved, but it is clear that the debate over gun rights in America is far from over

Original article Teaser

ATF Director Refuses to Answer If Americans Will Be Jailed Over New Pistol Brace Rule

Joe Biden’s ATF Director Steve Dettelbach refused to answer if his agency’s new pistol brace rules will result in Americans being thrown in prison if they don’t comply.  “I’m trying to figure out how this works,” Republican Rep. Jeff Van Drew bega to ask. “What kind of enforcement mechanisms will the ATF utilize to impose fines or maybe up to 10 years in jail time for those who do not comply or are unaware of the pistol brace rule. How do you gonna do that?” The ATF pistol brace rule requires gun owners to register pistols with stabilizing braces with the ATF, turn over their guns, or face 10 years in jail.  Dettelbach refused to directly address the question, leading

Details to ATF Director Refuses to Answer If Americans Will Be Jailed Over New Pistol Brace Rule