Die SPD im Saarland verlässt sich auch bei ihren Haushaltstricks auf „Notlagen

Zitat: „In such a situation, saving should not become an imperative.“ Anyone who makes such or similar statements deserves – to put it bluntly – to be punched in the face! Because even the sentence suggests that „saving“ was apparently not even considered as an option! There is a wide corridor between „saving“ and „throwing money away“ – also between saving and being frugal with taxpayers‘ money! No one has declared „saving“ as an end in itself, but it is always (at most!) called for in order to handle money responsibly and frugally. There is certainly enough money in the federal budget that the economy and the citizens of this country have provided. Therefore, they also have the claim and the right that this money is used responsibly and frugally in any case. However, apparently the amount of money already blinds the minds, so that only wasting it is identified as the goal. It always depends on „where“ savings are made and „what“ the tax funds are spent on. Just looking at the amounts that are spent abroad without any legal obligations and/or any checks – and now especially in terms of arms deliveries and Ukraine, as well as the stationing of the Bundeswehr in Lithuania – this has nothing to do with responsible management. This is arbitrary ideological and controlled politics! These governments (federal and state) lack any sense of proportion and responsibility towards the people and especially towards future generations. The Federal Constitutional Court obliged the government to show more „foresight“ in the context of „climate policy“ and thus increase spending. Unfortunately, the counterbalance of subjecting all expenses to critical scrutiny for exactly this reason, without suspending the debt brake or determining a retroactive (!) emergency situation, is still pending and cannot be expected due to the mental state. However, these „emergencies“ are not „emergency lies“ because there is no coercion behind them, but once again (!) only the will is being enforced to preserve one’s own green-blind ideology untouched into the future and to let all other state expenditures, which are actually more important, more or less fall by the wayside. After us, the deluge! This is only how parties that are on the decline think, and exclusively so

Original Artikel Teaser

Auch im Saarland setzt die SPD für ihre Haushaltstricks auf “Notlagen”

ZItat: „„Sparen darf in einer solchen Situation nicht zum Imperativ werden.“ Wer solche oder ähnliche Aussagen macht, dem gehört – auf gut deutsch gesagt – erst einmal auf’s Maul geschlagen! Weil schon dem Satz anzuhören ist, dass „Sparen“ als Option offenbar gar nicht erwogen wurde/wird! Zwischen „Sparen“ und „Geld rausschmeißen“ gibt es einen ganz breiten Korridor – auch zwischen sparen und sparsam mit den Steuergeldern umgehen! Niemand hat „Sparen“ zum Selbstzweck erklärt, sondern es wird stets (und allenfalls!) zum sparsamen Umgang aufgefordert. Es ist wahrlich genug Geld im Bundeshalt für das die Wirtschaft und die Bürger dieses Landes gesorgt haben. Sie haben deshalb auch den Anspruch und das Recht, dass mit diesem Geld in jedem Fall verantwortungsvoll und sparsam umgegangen

Details zu Auch im Saarland setzt die SPD für ihre Haushaltstricks auf “Notlagen”